Skip to content

SKILLS DEVELOPMENT | PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Nobody could agree on what good looked like. So we went and found out…

In a market where technical talent is the sharpest competitive edge, this Big 4 firm had a problem hiding in plain sight: no clear pathway for their engineers, designers, and AI specialists to grow. Before a single framework could be built, someone had to define what growth really meant. That’s where this story starts.

What the firm was really up against

This firm was feeling that pressure. They had talented specialists across Engineering, Design, and AI, but no structured career pathways to develop them, retain them, or signal to the market that this was a place where technical ambition could genuinely flourish. In a sector where the best technical minds have choices, that absence was a liability.

The risk wasn’t just losing people to competitors. It was losing the capability edge that differentiated the firm in the first place.

The Impact

57 %
13 %
1630 +

The decision that changed everything

The firm came to Solvd with a genuine challenge and, unusually, without a predetermined answer. Stakeholders weren’t aligned on what good looked like, what a framework should contain, or how development conversations in technical disciplines should work differently from those across the wider business.

Rather than treat that ambiguity as a blocker, Solvd treated it as the starting point. If nobody was certain what was needed, the answer was to go and find out.

Digging deeper to design smarter

The research phase began inside the firm’s existing communities of practice – the informal networks where technical specialists already gathered, shared knowledge, and made sense of their roles.

What emerged was a clear and consistent picture: the technical specialist experience was deeply inconsistent. Career development conversations were happening unevenly, or not at all. The frameworks that existed elsewhere in the business didn’t translate to the specific demands and motivations of engineers, designers, and AI practitioners. Specialists were being managed through a lens that simply didn’t fit them.

Those insights shaped a strategic report that gave the firm something it hadn’t had before: a clear, evidence-based foundation for its skills and career development strategy across all four technical areas. Before a platform was built or a pathway designed, the firm understood what it was building toward and why.

What we built together

A bespoke technical skills and career development programme – Crafts – built from the ground up for engineers, designers, and AI specialists, with its own pathways, its own platform, and its own identity.

The results, and the ripple beyond them

The platform launched across 9 craft pathways, reaching over 1,630 specialists – a meaningful scale for something built around the specific needs of technical disciplines.

57% of enrolled users actively engaged with the platform, rating themselves against the framework and beginning to map their own progression. Of those, 13% recorded a measurable level change. No just browsing – they were using the platform to grow and drive development.

For a programme that began without a clear definition of what good even looked like, that was a significant shift. Specialists who previously had no structured picture of where their career could go now have pathways, language, and a platform to track their progress. Managers who struggled to have meaningful development conversations in technical disciplines now have the scaffolding to do so.

Crafts didn’t just fill a gap in the firm’s talent strategy. It gave technical ambition somewhere to land.

The 5Di Methodology

A six-stage framework that ensures every solution we build is grounded in reality, tested before it scales, and designed to produce lasting change.

We start by getting clear on what we're actually solving. Not the brief as it arrived, but the challenge underneath it – the real outcomes that need to shift, the stakeholders who need to be brought along, and the constraints we're designing within. Clarity here saves significant time and cost later.

This is where we go in deep. We embed ourselves in your organisation – talking to people at every level, observing how things actually work, and finding the gaps between the official version of events and the lived one. Work shadowing, stakeholder interviews, existing data: we use whatever gets us closest to the truth.

With genuine insight in hand, we design a solution that fits. Not an adapted version of something we've built before – something built from what we've learned about your people, your culture, and your specific challenge. Every creative decision is traceable back to something we discovered.

We build with rigour and with speed. Prototypes get tested with real audiences before anything is finalised. Feedback is built into the process, not bolted on at the end. The solution that goes live is one that's already been in the room with your people.

Implementation is where a lot of programmes lose momentum. We stay close through rollout – ensuring uptake is strong, the experience lands as intended, and the people responsible for delivering it feel equipped and supported.


The work doesn't stop at deployment. We measure what's changing, identify what could be stronger, and refine continuously. A solution that improves over time is worth significantly more than one that's perfect on paper and static in practice.